From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Rose

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Feb 23, 1987
521 A.2d 300 (Me. 1987)

Opinion

Argued January 5, 1987.

Decided February 23, 1987.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Cumberland County.

Murray, Plumb Murray, David P. Silk, Ellen C. Ballou (orally), Portland, for plaintiff.

Reef, Jordan Hrycay, Norman S. Reef, Lillian B. Kennedy (orally), Portland, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, SCOLNIK and CLIFFORD, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

In this divorce action on the appeal of Dorothy Rose from a judgment of the District Court, Portland, the Superior Court, Cumberland County, vacated the judgment of the District Court and remanded the matter to that court for another hearing on all issues. Richard Rose appealed and Dorothy Rose cross-appealed from the judgment of the Superior Court. Because that judgment is not final for purposes of appeal and this case does not fall within any of the recognized exceptions for which interlocutory appeals may be brought, we conclude that the appeal and cross-appeal must be dismissed as premature. See Luchetti v. Luchetti, 445 A.2d 675, 676 (Me. 1982); MacDougall v. MacDougall, 403 A.2d 783, 784 (Me. 1979).

The entry is: Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed.

All concurring.


Summaries of

Rose v. Rose

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Feb 23, 1987
521 A.2d 300 (Me. 1987)
Case details for

Rose v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:Dorothy ROSE v. Richard ROSE

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Feb 23, 1987

Citations

521 A.2d 300 (Me. 1987)