In Polk v. Rose, 25 Md. 160, it was said in reference to such sales, that "every act, the performance of which is made a condition precedent to the validity of the acts," of the officers, must be shown affirmatively; and "the recitals in a tax deed, are not evidence against the owner of the property, but the facts must be established by proof aliunde."
Summary of this case from Hewitt v. ParsleyNo. 2D01-612.
March 06, 2002.
Appeal from the Unemployment Apps. Com'n.
Aff.
In Polk v. Rose, 25 Md. 160, it was said in reference to such sales, that "every act, the performance of which is made a condition precedent to the validity of the acts," of the officers, must be shown affirmatively; and "the recitals in a tax deed, are not evidence against the owner of the property, but the facts must be established by proof aliunde."
Summary of this case from Hewitt v. ParsleyFull title:ROSE v. POLK COUNTY ASS'N FOR HANDICAPPED CITIZENS, INC
Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Date published: Mar 6, 2002
In this way bills quia timet anticipate and guard against future and contingent injuries and assure the…
Whiteford v. YellottThis Court has had frequent occasion to announce the familiar proposition that equity will not allow a title…