From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Paycom Payroll LLC

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Aug 6, 2024
No. CIV-24-202-G (W.D. Okla. Aug. 6, 2024)

Opinion

CIV-24-202-G

08-06-2024

CHRYSTAL D. ROSE, Plaintiff, v. PAYCOM PAYROLL LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

CHARLES B. GOODWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Now before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 5), seeking dismissal of the claims raised in Plaintiff's original Petition (Doc. No. 1-1). Plaintiff has now timely filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 7). Plaintiff's Amended Complaint supersedes the original pleading and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991).

Accordingly, the pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 5) is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Rose v. Paycom Payroll LLC

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Aug 6, 2024
No. CIV-24-202-G (W.D. Okla. Aug. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Rose v. Paycom Payroll LLC

Case Details

Full title:CHRYSTAL D. ROSE, Plaintiff, v. PAYCOM PAYROLL LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Aug 6, 2024

Citations

No. CIV-24-202-G (W.D. Okla. Aug. 6, 2024)