From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Konis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1988
137 A.D.2d 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

February 22, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Patsalos, J.).


Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Under the circumstances, we find no basis for disturbing the trial court's refusal to restore this action to the Trial Calendar (see, Hoe Co. v Crown Cork Seal Co., 22 A.D.2d 861, affd 16 N.Y.2d 574; Spodek v Lasser Stables, 89 A.D.2d 892). Mollen, P.J., Lawrence, Eiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rose v. Konis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1988
137 A.D.2d 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Rose v. Konis

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE ROSE, Individually and as Mother and Natural Guardian of SUZANNE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1988

Citations

137 A.D.2d 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)