The Report explained Mr. Rose had already filed over fifty lawsuits in both federal and Idaho state courts. Rose v. Idaho, No. 1:15-CV-00491-EJL-REB, 2016 WL 4394155, at *8 (D. Idaho Aug. 15, 2016), report and recommendation adopted, No. 1:15-CV-00491-EJL, 2017 WL 2438841 (D. Idaho June 6, 2017).

As a preliminary matter, Ms. Cook argues that the ADJ abused its discretion by failing to apply legal standards used by the federal courts in making vexatious litigant determinations. Specifically, she points to requirements found in Rose v. Idaho , No. 1:15-cv-00491-EJL-REB, 2016 WL 4394155, at *7–9 (D. Idaho Aug. 15, 2016) and Ringgold-Lockhart v. County of Los Angeles , 761 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2014). However, those federal standards do not correspond with the requirements of Idaho Court Administrative Rule 59 and are inapplicable.