From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Holland Am. Line, Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 8, 2023
No. C22-1513-KKE (W.D. Wash. Dec. 8, 2023)

Opinion

C22-1513-KKE

12-08-2023

ARDEN ROSE, Plaintiff, v. HOLLAND AMERICA LINE INC et al, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND CASE SCHEDULE

Kymberly K. Evanson United States District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion for Extension of Pre-Trial and Trial Dates. Dkt. No. 23. The parties proposed extending certain case deadlines, including the dispositive motions deadline, as well as the trial date. Id. The Court can accommodate a trial date of October 28, 2024, but declines to enter the other pretrial deadlines requested by the parties. The Court requires approximately 120 days between the dispositive motions deadline and the trial date. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 20. The parties' proposed schedule results in fewer than 60 days between the dispositive motions deadline and the trial date. Dkt. No. 23-1.

The Court therefore DENIES the parties' stipulation (Dkt. No. 23), subject to re-filing in accordance with the Court's requirement as stated above.


Summaries of

Rose v. Holland Am. Line, Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 8, 2023
No. C22-1513-KKE (W.D. Wash. Dec. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Rose v. Holland Am. Line, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ARDEN ROSE, Plaintiff, v. HOLLAND AMERICA LINE INC et al, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 8, 2023

Citations

No. C22-1513-KKE (W.D. Wash. Dec. 8, 2023)