From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 3, 2022
No. 6975-22S (U.S.T.C. Oct. 3, 2022)

Opinion

6975-22S

10-03-2022

STUART W. ROSE & TRINA C. DUNCAN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER AND DECISION

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge

On September 15, 2022, the parties filed a Proposed Stipulated Decision for the Court's consideration. However, upon review thereof, the Court notes that the caption on that document is incorrect, insofar as the docket number lacks an "S". Consequently, the Court is unable to process the parties' Proposed Stipulated Decision.

In view of the foregoing, to give effect to the agreement of the parties in this case, and for cause, it is

ORDERED that the parties' Proposed Stipulated Decision is recharacterized as the parties' Stipulation of Settlement. It is further

ORDERED and DECIDED that there is no deficiency in income tax due from, nor overpayment due to, the petitioners for the taxable year 2019; and

That there is no penalty due from the petitioners for the taxable year 2019 under the provisions of of I.R.C. §6662(a).


Summaries of

Rose v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 3, 2022
No. 6975-22S (U.S.T.C. Oct. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Rose v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:STUART W. ROSE & TRINA C. DUNCAN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Oct 3, 2022

Citations

No. 6975-22S (U.S.T.C. Oct. 3, 2022)