From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Brady

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1900
31 Misc. 791 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Opinion

June, 1900.

Thomas W. McKnight, for appellants.

Frederick H. Lincoln, for respondent.


It has been repeatedly held that all the facts necessary to confer jurisdiction upon an inferior court must appear in the record. The record contains no proof of the residence of the defendants, and, as this defect is one which may be asserted for the first time on appeal (Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. 151), the judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, but under the circumstances, without costs. Willis v. Parker, 30 Misc. 750; 62 N.Y.S. 1078.

Present: BEEKMAN, P.J., GIEGERICH and O'GORMAN, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, without costs.


Summaries of

Rose v. Brady

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1900
31 Misc. 791 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)
Case details for

Rose v. Brady

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES ROSE, Respondent, v . THOMAS F. BRADY et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1900

Citations

31 Misc. 791 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)