From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Blitman Construction Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1962
17 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

October 9, 1962


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 14, 1960, which denied his application for a preference under rule 9 of the Queens County Supreme Court Rules; and (2) from so much of an order of said court, dated September 18, 1961, made on reargument, as adhered to the original decision and denied the preference. Order dated September 18, 1961, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the record fails to establish any abuse of discretion in denying the preference. Appeal from order, dated December 14, 1960, dismissed. That order was superseded by the later order granting reargument. Kleinfeld, Acting P.J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rose v. Blitman Construction Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1962
17 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Rose v. Blitman Construction Corporation

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD ROSE, Appellant, v. BLITMAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 9, 1962

Citations

17 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)