From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Anderson Hay & Grain Co.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Apr 2, 2014
327 P.3d 613 (Wash. 2014)

Opinion

No. 87539–1.

2014-04-2

Charles ROSE, Petitioner, v. ANDERSON HAY AND GRAIN COMPANY, Respondent.


Prior report: Wash.App., 168 Wash.App. 474, 276 P.3d 382.

ORDER


, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Owens, J.M. Johnson (Justice J.M. Johnson recused and Justice C. Johnson sat for Justice J.M. Johnson), Wiggins (Justice Wiggins recused and Justice Fairhurst sat for Justice Wiggins), and Gordon McCloud, considered at its April 1, 2014, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Three for reconsideration in light of Piel v. City of Federal Way, 177 Wash.2d 604, 306 P.3d 879 (2013).


Summaries of

Rose v. Anderson Hay & Grain Co.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Apr 2, 2014
327 P.3d 613 (Wash. 2014)
Case details for

Rose v. Anderson Hay & Grain Co.

Case Details

Full title:Charles ROSE, Petitioner, v. ANDERSON HAY AND GRAIN COMPANY, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Apr 2, 2014

Citations

327 P.3d 613 (Wash. 2014)
180 Wash. 2d 1001
180 Wn. 2d 1001

Citing Cases

Rose v. Anderson Hay & Grain Co.

This court accepted review of that decision, but remanded Rose's case to the Court of Appeals for…

Rose v. Anderson Hay & Grain Co.

Our Supreme Court remanded the matter back to this court for reconsideration in light of that court's recent…