From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Abraham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 14, 2011
CIV F 08-606 AWI SMS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)

Opinion

CIV F 08-606 AWI SMS Doc. No. 101

09-14-2011

DON ROSE, Plaintiff, v. SAMUEL ABRAHAM, BELLA ROBLES CORP., INC., STEVEN DUCE, RICHARD WYNN, and BANK OF THE SIERRA, Defendants.


ORDER CORRECTING SEPTEMBER 13, 2011, ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC

On September 13, 2011, this Court issued an order that discharged a previous order to show cause. See Doc. No. 101. However, the title of the order was erroneously stated as "Order on Plaintiff's Motion for Ex Pare Writ of Attachment and Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order." The title should have been "Order Discharging Order to Show Cause." The September 13, 2011, as the body and substance of the order make clear, have nothing to do with a writ of attachment or temporary restraining order. In order to alleviate any possible confusion, the Court will correct the September 13, 2011, order nunc pro tunc.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the September 13, 2011, order (Doc. No. 101) is CORRECTED NUNC PRO TUNC such that the title of the order shall now be "Order Discharging Order to Show Cause."

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rose v. Abraham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 14, 2011
CIV F 08-606 AWI SMS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Rose v. Abraham

Case Details

Full title:DON ROSE, Plaintiff, v. SAMUEL ABRAHAM, BELLA ROBLES CORP., INC., STEVEN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 14, 2011

Citations

CIV F 08-606 AWI SMS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)