From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosas v. Warden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 6, 2023
2:23-cv-0617 AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-0617 AC P

04-06-2023

MARIO ROSAS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis application or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate application in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee. Petitioner is cautioned that the in forma pauperis application form includes a section that must be completed by a prison official.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.


Summaries of

Rosas v. Warden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 6, 2023
2:23-cv-0617 AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Rosas v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:MARIO ROSAS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 6, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-0617 AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2023)