From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosario v. Folino

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 23, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-782 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 23, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-782.

August 23, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


The Plaintiff's Complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on June 14, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Francis X. Caiazza for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on August 8, 2006, recommended that the Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 4) be denied.

Objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by the Plaintiff on August 15, 2006.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto, the following ORDER is entered:

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2006,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 4) is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Caiazza, (Doc. 8), dated August 8, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the district court.


Summaries of

Rosario v. Folino

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 23, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-782 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 23, 2006)
Case details for

Rosario v. Folino

Case Details

Full title:AUGUSTINE ROSARIO, Plaintiff, v. LOUIS S. FOLINO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 23, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-782 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 23, 2006)