From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosano v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 1994
208 A.D.2d 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 17, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendants' motion is unconditionally granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff has failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the delay in serving the complaint and to submit a proper affidavit of merits. His complaint should have been unconditionally dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b) (see, Kel Mgt. Corp. v. Roger Wells, 64 N.Y.2d 904; Stolowitz v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 60 N.Y.2d 685; Ferrara v. Guardino, 164 A.D.2d 932; Innerarity v. County of Westchester, 144 A.D.2d 645; Niedermeier v. Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs., 143 A.D.2d 78; Galio v Restrepo, 38 A.D.2d 586). Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rosano v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 1994
208 A.D.2d 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Rosano v. County of Nassau

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE R. ROSANO, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 17, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
617 N.Y.S.2d 789

Citing Cases

Roux v. Patrick

Ordered that the appellants are awarded one bill of costs. It is undisputed that the plaintiffs did not serve…

Caruso v. International House of Pancakes

Since the plaintiff failed to address the merits of his case in opposition to the defendant's motion to…