From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosamond v. Murff

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
Apr 6, 1916
185 S.W. 1067 (Tex. Civ. App. 1916)

Opinion

No. 1623.

April 6, 1916.

Appeal from Van Zandt County Court; R. M. Lively, Judge.

Proceedings between J. O. Rosamond and J. C. Murff in the nature of a habeas corpus to obtain custody of a minor child. Judgment for Murff, and Rosamond appeals. Dismissed.

Crawford Carlisle, of Grand Saline, for appellant. Earl M. Greer and C. L. Stanford, both of Canton, for appellee.


This is a proceeding in the nature of a habeas corpus to obtain custody of a minor child. The proceedings were had on July 5, 1915, which was not at a regular term of the county court. The proceedings in this case are identical with those in the case of Ex parte Reeves, 100 Tex. 617, 103 S.W. 478, wherein it was decided that no appeal would lie to the Court of Civil Appeals from the order of the judge. Therefore this appeal must be dismissed for want of Jurisdiction in this court to entertain it.


Summaries of

Rosamond v. Murff

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
Apr 6, 1916
185 S.W. 1067 (Tex. Civ. App. 1916)
Case details for

Rosamond v. Murff

Case Details

Full title:ROSAMOND v. MURFF

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana

Date published: Apr 6, 1916

Citations

185 S.W. 1067 (Tex. Civ. App. 1916)

Citing Cases

Talkington v. Talkington

) 209 S.W. 438; Barker v. Wilson (Tex.Civ.App.) 189 S.W. 748; Surety Co. v Castle Construction Co.…

San Antonio Aransas Pass Ry. Co. v. Blair

S.W. 1058; Thorne v. Moore, 101 Tex. 205, 105 S.W. 985; Ex parte Reeves, 100 Tex. 617, 103 S.W. 478; Nalle…