From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosales v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 2, 2012
98 A.D.3d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-08-2

In the Matter of Luis ROSALES, Appellant, v. Albert PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Luis Rosales, Dannemora, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Luis Rosales, Dannemora, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Hayden, J.), entered April 21, 2011 in Chemung County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules following a tier III hearing. He commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging this determination. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and petitioner appeals. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the subject determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been restored to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the appeal is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of VanNess v. Fischer, 89 A.D.3d 1248, 1248–1249, 932 N.Y.S.2d 385 [2011];Matter of Joseph v. LaClair, 79 A.D.3d 1495, 1496, 912 N.Y.S.2d 916 [2010] ).

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN, MALONE JR., KAVANAGH and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rosales v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 2, 2012
98 A.D.3d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Rosales v. Prack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Luis ROSALES, Appellant, v. Albert PRACK, as Director of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 2, 2012

Citations

98 A.D.3d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5860
948 N.Y.S.2d 920

Citing Cases

Colon v. Venettozzi

The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…