From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosado v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 18, 2023
No. A23I0113 (Ga. Ct. App. Jan. 18, 2023)

Opinion

A23I0113

01-18-2023

MARQUISE ARMOND ROSADO v. THE STATE.


The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

Marquise Armond Rosado, who was charged with rape, sexual battery, and aggravated sodomy, seeks interlocutory review of a trial court order setting a pre-trial bond amount of $50,000. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

Rosado filed a "Writ of Certiorari-Probable Cause" to the Georgia Supreme Court, which docketed his filing as an application for interlocutory review and transferred the case to this Court. See Case No. S23I0362 (Nov. 29, 2022).

Because this case remains pending below, the trial court's order setting Rosado's bond reduction was interlocutory. See Howard v. State, 194 Ga.App. 857 (392 S.E.2d 562) (1990). To appeal the order, Rosado was required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure, including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Rosado did not obtain a certificate of immediate review from the trial court within ten days of entry of the order he wishes to appeal. Rosado's failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this application, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Mullinax v. State, 271 Ga. 112 (1) (515 S.E.2d 839) (1999); Howard, 194 Ga.App. at 857.


Summaries of

Rosado v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 18, 2023
No. A23I0113 (Ga. Ct. App. Jan. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Rosado v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARQUISE ARMOND ROSADO v. THE STATE.

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 18, 2023

Citations

No. A23I0113 (Ga. Ct. App. Jan. 18, 2023)