From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosado v. Chicago Police Officer Kavanaugh

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D
Mar 27, 2001
No. 00 C 1121 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 27, 2001)

Opinion

No. 00 C 1121

March 27, 2001


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


This case had a rather frantic beginning, which prompted, among other things, two motions for attorneys' fees. Since a December 7, 2000, status hearing things seem to have calmed down somewhat — at least, we have not been advised of any confrontations since then. We will, moreover, be brought up to date at a status next week, and we will be interested to know why the City has answered but the individual officers have not. In the meantime, we deny the August 25, 2000, motion for fees, more as a matter of judicial housekeeping than anything else. We can revisit the matter pursuant to the December motion at a later time, hopefully aided by the course of this litigation since then.


Summaries of

Rosado v. Chicago Police Officer Kavanaugh

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D
Mar 27, 2001
No. 00 C 1121 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 27, 2001)
Case details for

Rosado v. Chicago Police Officer Kavanaugh

Case Details

Full title:JOE LUIS ROSADO, Plaintiff, v. CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER KAVANAUGH, Star…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D

Date published: Mar 27, 2001

Citations

No. 00 C 1121 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 27, 2001)