From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ROSA v. BERACHA

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 19, 2009
1 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 2009)

Opinion

No. SC09-109.

February 19, 2009.

Lower Tribunal No(s). 4D07-3750, 07-6293COWE80.


Because petitioner has failed to show that the Fourth District Court of Appeal has a ministerial duty to decide the merits of Rosa v. Beracha, No. 4D07-3750, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So. 2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating that mandamus "is [not] proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act"), approved, 431 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 1983).

WELLS, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and LABARGA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

ROSA v. BERACHA

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 19, 2009
1 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 2009)
Case details for

ROSA v. BERACHA

Case Details

Full title:LORRAINE ROSA, Petitioner(s) v. LAUREN ROSA BERACHA, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 19, 2009

Citations

1 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 2009)