From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosa-Diaz v. Harry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 30, 2017
Civil No. 1:16-cv-2303 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2017)

Opinion

Civil No. 1:16-cv-2303

01-30-2017

GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ and MASON SWANSON, Plaintiff, v. LAUREL HARRY et al., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM

The background of this order is as follows: On November 14, 2016, Plaintiff Rosa-Diaz ("Diaz") filed a civil rights complaint on behalf of himself and another inmate, Mason Swanson, setting forth claims against state officials related to conditions of confinement, medical indifference, retaliation, discrimination, and failure to act on his grievances. Diaz named approximately twenty defendants including prison officials and Department of Corrections officials. The complaint was 37 pages long and included 208 paragraphs.

The magistrate judge examined the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, as well as with the jurisprudence set forth in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, -- U.S. --, 129 S.Ct. 1937 (2009).

The report and recommendation filed by the magistrate judge recommends dismissal of the complaint as to Defendants Zobitne, Moore, Heist, Harry, Woodside and Wetzel without prejudice to file an amended complaint. On November 28, 2016, Diaz filed a motion that his case be put on temporary hold. By order dated January 10, 2017, Diaz was granted leave to file objections to the report and recommendation by March 13, 2017. On January 27, 2017, Diaz filed a motion to file an amended complaint along with the amended complaint. His amended complaint is 31 pages long with 182 paragraphs excluding the paragraphs related to the request for relief.

In light of the fact that the magistrate judge recommended that Diaz be granted the opportunity to file an amended complaint, he shall be permitted to do so, subject to a review of the complaint by the magistrate judge as to the requirements set forth in Twombly, Iqbal and Federal Rule of Procedure 8.

An appropriate order will issue.

s/Sylvia H. Rambo

SYLVIA H. RAMBO

United States District Judge Dated: January 30, 2017


Summaries of

Rosa-Diaz v. Harry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 30, 2017
Civil No. 1:16-cv-2303 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2017)
Case details for

Rosa-Diaz v. Harry

Case Details

Full title:GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ and MASON SWANSON, Plaintiff, v. LAUREL HARRY et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2017

Citations

Civil No. 1:16-cv-2303 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2017)