From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roque v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jan 10, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:19CV401 (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:19CV401

01-10-2020

ROBERTO ROQUE, JR., Petitioner, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Petitioner, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On December 6, 2019, Petitioner moved to withdraw his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). "A [petitioner's] motion under Rule 41(a)(2) for dismissal without prejudice should not be denied absent substantial prejudice to the [respondent]." Andes v. Versant Corp., 788 F.2d 1033, 1036 (4th Cir. 1986) (citing Kenrose Mfg. Co. v. Fred Whitaker Co., 512 F.2d 890, 895 (4th Cir. 1972)). Respondent has not suggested that he will suffer any prejudice. Accordingly, the Motion to Withdraw (ECF No. 14) will be GRANTED. The action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

John A. Gibney, Jr.

United States District Judge Date: 10 January 2020
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Roque v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jan 10, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:19CV401 (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Roque v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTO ROQUE, JR., Petitioner, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Jan 10, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:19CV401 (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2020)