From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roper v. Astrue

UNITED STATES STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 8, 2011
Civil No.09-1447-TC (D. Or. Nov. 8, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No.09-1447-TC

11-08-2011

ELAINE ROPER, Plaintiff, v, MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on October 6, 2011. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co.. Ltd., 700 F,2d 1202,1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist, 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo. I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

________________________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Roper v. Astrue

UNITED STATES STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 8, 2011
Civil No.09-1447-TC (D. Or. Nov. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Roper v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ELAINE ROPER, Plaintiff, v, MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Nov 8, 2011

Citations

Civil No.09-1447-TC (D. Or. Nov. 8, 2011)