From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Root v. Pallito

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT
Nov 5, 2012
File No. 1:12-cv-70-jgm (D. Vt. Nov. 5, 2012)

Opinion

File No. 1:12-cv-70-jgm

11-05-2012

KYLE ROOT, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW PALLITO, Commissioner, Vermont Department of Corrections, Defendant.


ORDER

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed October 2, 2012. (Doc. 11.) After de novo review and absent objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff shall be allowed thirty days to file an Amended Complaint. Failure to file an Amended Complaint on or before December 5, 2012 shall result in the dismissal of this case with prejudice.

It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

SO ORDERED.

Dated at Brattleboro, in the District of Vermont, this 5th day of November, 2012.

___________

Honorable J. Garvan Murtha

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Root v. Pallito

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT
Nov 5, 2012
File No. 1:12-cv-70-jgm (D. Vt. Nov. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Root v. Pallito

Case Details

Full title:KYLE ROOT, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW PALLITO, Commissioner, Vermont Department…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT

Date published: Nov 5, 2012

Citations

File No. 1:12-cv-70-jgm (D. Vt. Nov. 5, 2012)