From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roosevelt-Hennix v. City of Florence

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 15, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00353-RPM (D. Colo. Aug. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00353-RPM

08-15-2012

LARA ROOSEVELT-HENNIX, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF FLORENCE, a municipal corporation; OFFICER SHANE PRICKETT, in his individual and official capacities; and OFFICER JAMES BARR, in his individual and official capacities, Defendants.


ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO VACATE

THIS MATTER having come before the Court, the Court having received and reviewed Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Vacate and the file, having considered said Unopposed Motion, the Court hereby

ORDERS that the Motion is GRANTED. The deadline for the Parties to submit a Pretrial Order (August 16, 2012) and the Pretrial Conference set for August 23, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. are vacated and these requirements are held in abeyance pending the resolution of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals case no. 12-1307.

BY THE COURT:

________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Roosevelt-Hennix v. City of Florence

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 15, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00353-RPM (D. Colo. Aug. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Roosevelt-Hennix v. City of Florence

Case Details

Full title:LARA ROOSEVELT-HENNIX, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF FLORENCE, a municipal…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 15, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00353-RPM (D. Colo. Aug. 15, 2012)