From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ROOSEVELT BRAZELL ADC # 100810 v. ROBINSON

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
May 13, 2009
5:09CV00059 JMM (E.D. Ark. May. 13, 2009)

Opinion

5:09CV00059 JMM.

May 13, 2009


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, and dismissal of this action shall count as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) provides that: "In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. . . .

The Court FURTHER CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and Judgment would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

ROOSEVELT BRAZELL ADC # 100810 v. ROBINSON

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
May 13, 2009
5:09CV00059 JMM (E.D. Ark. May. 13, 2009)
Case details for

ROOSEVELT BRAZELL ADC # 100810 v. ROBINSON

Case Details

Full title:ROOSEVELT BRAZELL ADC # 100810 PLAINTIFF v. GERALD ROBINSON et al…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: May 13, 2009

Citations

5:09CV00059 JMM (E.D. Ark. May. 13, 2009)

Citing Cases

Looper v. Sanders

Such allegations are not sufficient to state a constitutional claim. Brazell v. Robinson, 2009 WL 1392577…