From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rooney v. Everett

The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One
Dec 14, 1961
367 P.2d 149 (Wash. 1961)

Opinion

No. 35793.

December 14, 1961.

MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES — ABOLITION OF POSITIONS — JUDICIAL REVIEW. The legislative action of a city in abolishing a position of employment is not subject to judicial review in the absence of a showing of bad faith.

See Ann. 4 A.L.R. 207, 37 A.L.R. 816; Am. Jur., Municipal Corporations § 227.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 66680, Thomas R. Stiger, J., entered August 30, 1960. Affirmed.

Action to recover back wages. Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment of dismissal.

Dailey Brinster, for appellant.

Leslie R. Cooper, for respondents.



This is an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing appellant's action against respondent city of Everett to recover back pay for work as assistant street painter. The court, upon this appeal, did not have the benefit of oral argument by either party.

By budget and salary ordinance for the period in question, no provision was made for the position. Appellant, who was formerly the assistant street painter, has continued to do the same work as a day laborer.

[1] The legislative action of a city in abolishing a position is not subject to judicial review in the absence of a showing of bad faith. State ex rel. Morris v. Seattle, 5 Wn.2d 267, 104 P.2d 118.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Rooney v. Everett

The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One
Dec 14, 1961
367 P.2d 149 (Wash. 1961)
Case details for

Rooney v. Everett

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD ROONEY, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF EVERETT et al., Respondents

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One

Date published: Dec 14, 1961

Citations

367 P.2d 149 (Wash. 1961)
367 P.2d 149
59 Wash. 2d 172

Citing Cases

Diedrick v. School Dist. 81

[3] It is further argued that sufficient cause did not exist to nonrenew and reduce to teaching positions AS…