Roohr v. Town of Cromwell

2 Citing cases

  1. Conroy v. City of Stamford

    161 Conn. App. 691 (Conn. App. Ct. 2015)   Cited 2 times

    -------- More recently, in Roohr v. Cromwell, 302 Conn. 767, 31 A.3d 360 (2011), our Supreme Court applied its holding in Ciarlelli to a case with underlying facts that are materially similar to the facts underlying the present appeal. Thus, our Supreme Court's analysis in Roohr guides our resolution of this appeal. In Roohr, the plaintiff, Thomas Roohr, was a municipal police officer who successfully passed a preemployment physical examination that revealed no evidence of hypertension or heart disease.

  2. Staurovsky v. City of Milford Police Dep't

    164 Conn. App. 182 (Conn. App. Ct. 2016)   Cited 10 times

    Conroy v. Stamford, 161 Conn.App. 691, 703–704, 129 A.3d 137 (2015), cert. denied, 320 Conn. 917, 131 A.3d 1154 (2016).In cases subsequent to Ciarlelli, our appellate courts have applied that interpretation of § 31–294c (a). For example, in Roohr v. Cromwell, 302 Conn. 767, 771, 31 A.3d 360 (2011), the Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of a plaintiff's claim for § 7–433c benefits because the record substantiated the commissioner's finding that “the plaintiff was, in fact, diagnosed with hypertension and informed of that diagnosis more than one year before he filed his claim....”Particularly pertinent to the present appeal is Conroy v. Stamford, supra, 161 Conn.App. 691, 129 A.3d 137.