From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rood v. Sec'y of CDCR

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 7, 2022
1:22-cv-00449-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00449-SAB (PC)

11-07-2022

COLTON JAMES ROOD, Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY OF CDCR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

(ECF NOS. 13, 18)

Plaintiff Colton James Rood is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On June 15, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff's first amended complaint, found no cognizable claims, and granted one final opportunity to amend the complaint within thirty days. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff has not responded to the Court's order and the time to do so has expired. ccordingly, within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply ith a court order, and failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff's failure to comply ith this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rood v. Sec'y of CDCR

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 7, 2022
1:22-cv-00449-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Rood v. Sec'y of CDCR

Case Details

Full title:COLTON JAMES ROOD, Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY OF CDCR, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 7, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-00449-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2022)