From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rood v. Lockwood

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:19-cv-1806 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1806 KJM AC P

06-28-2021

COLTON JAMES ROOD, Plaintiff, v. LOCKWOOD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 16, 2021, the undersigned filed findings and recommendations that recommended that the claims against defendant Shasta County Jail Hiring Authority be dismissed without prejudice. ECF No. 18. Plaintiff has now filed a notice advising that he would like to proceed on the complaint as screened and acknowledging that by proceeding without amending the complaint he is voluntarily dismissing the claims against defendant Shasta County Jail Hiring Authority. ECF No. 19.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The June 16, 2021 Findings and Recommendations recommending the dismissal of the claims against defendant Shasta County Jail Hiring Authority, ECF No. 18, are VACATED.

2. The claims against defendant Shasta County Jail Hiring Authority are voluntarily DISMISSED without prejudice. ECF No. 19.


Summaries of

Rood v. Lockwood

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:19-cv-1806 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Rood v. Lockwood

Case Details

Full title:COLTON JAMES ROOD, Plaintiff, v. LOCKWOOD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-1806 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)