From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rood v. Lockwood

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 22, 2022
2:20-cv-0271 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-0271 KJM AC P

11-22-2022

COLTON JAMES ROOD, Plaintiff, v. ISAAC LOCKWOOD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 63. However, it does not appear that they contemporaneously served plaintiff with a Rand Notice, as required by this court. See ECF No. 25 at 4, ¶ 11 (citing Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 935 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998)).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within twenty-four hours of receiving this order, defendants shall serve plaintiff with a Rand Notice, as required by the December 16, 2020 order. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that the motion for summary judgment be denied; and

2. Plaintiff shall have twenty-one days from the service of the Rand Notice to file his response to the motion for summary judgment.


Summaries of

Rood v. Lockwood

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 22, 2022
2:20-cv-0271 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Rood v. Lockwood

Case Details

Full title:COLTON JAMES ROOD, Plaintiff, v. ISAAC LOCKWOOD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 22, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-0271 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2022)