Opinion
Nos. 13–56310 13–56306.
2014-02-10
James Paul Sizemore, The Sizemore Law Firm PLC, El Segundo, CA, Andrew Nathan Chang, Esner, Chang & Boyer, Walnut Creek, CA, Stuart Bruce Esner, Esner, Chang & Boyer, Pasadena, CA, Elise R. Sanguinetti, Khorrami, LLP, Oakland, CA, Matthew J. Sill, Sill Law Group, Edmond, OK, for Plaintiffs–Appellees. Amy Bridget Alderfer, Esquire, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Karin Bohmholdt, Greenberg & Traurig LLP, Santa Monica, CA, Lori Gail Cohen, Victoria Davis Lockard, Esquire, Ginger Pigott, Esquire, Greenberg & Traurig LLP, Atlanta, GA, Elliot H. Scherker, Esquire, General, Greenberg Traurig PA, Miami, FL, for Defendant–Appellant.
James Paul Sizemore, The Sizemore Law Firm PLC, El Segundo, CA, Andrew Nathan Chang, Esner, Chang & Boyer, Walnut Creek, CA, Stuart Bruce Esner, Esner, Chang & Boyer, Pasadena, CA, Elise R. Sanguinetti, Khorrami, LLP, Oakland, CA, Matthew J. Sill, Sill Law Group, Edmond, OK, for Plaintiffs–Appellees. Amy Bridget Alderfer, Esquire, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Karin Bohmholdt, Greenberg & Traurig LLP, Santa Monica, CA, Lori Gail Cohen, Victoria Davis Lockard, Esquire, Ginger Pigott, Esquire, Greenberg & Traurig LLP, Atlanta, GA, Elliot H. Scherker, Esquire, General, Greenberg Traurig PA, Miami, FL, for Defendant–Appellant.
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion in Romo v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., No. 13–56310, shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judge McKEOWN did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.