From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romo v. City of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 20, 2024
CV 23-10864 WDK (PVC) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-10864 WDK (PVC)

12-20-2024

EZEQUIEL ROMO, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER: (1) ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND OR ALTER JUDGMENT

WILLIAM D. KELLER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment Under Rule 59(e) (Docket No. 10), the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report,” Docket No. 13). The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts the Report and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment Under Rule 59(e) is DENIED.

The Clerk shall serve copies of this Order on Plaintiff at his address of record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Romo v. City of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 20, 2024
CV 23-10864 WDK (PVC) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Romo v. City of L. A.

Case Details

Full title:EZEQUIEL ROMO, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 20, 2024

Citations

CV 23-10864 WDK (PVC) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2024)