From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 25, 1969
415 F.2d 478 (9th Cir. 1969)

Opinion

Nos. 21686, 21686-A.

August 25, 1969.

Thomas R. Sheridan (argued), of Simon, Sheridan, Murphy, Thornton Medvene, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

Jo Ann Dunn (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Wm. Matthew Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and ELY, Circuit Judges, and ROGER D. FOLEY, District Judge.

The Honorable Roger D. Foley, United States District Judge, District of Nevada, sitting by designation.


ORDER FOR REMAND


Pending the court's disposition of the appellants' petitions for rehearing, the government has moved, in effect, that the court withdraw the opinion issued by it on February 12, 1969, 408 F.2d 364, and that the causes be remanded to the district court for further proceedings. The government supports its motion by the affidavit of William Matthew Byrne, Jr., United States Attorney for the Central District of California. Mr. Byrne represents that it has been ascertained that the convictions were corrupted by perjurious testimony given by certain witnesses for the prosecution without the knowledge of the prosecuting authorities, at the time of the giving of the testimony, of its falsity.

Accordingly, the petitions for rehearing are granted and the consolidated causes are remanded to the district court for such additional proceedings as may be appropriate.

The court commends the government for the course which it has taken, through United States Attorney Byrne, in the interest of justice.


Summaries of

Romero v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 25, 1969
415 F.2d 478 (9th Cir. 1969)
Case details for

Romero v. United States

Case Details

Full title:David Perea ROMERO, Ronald Eugene Tickle, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 25, 1969

Citations

415 F.2d 478 (9th Cir. 1969)