From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 13, 2011
373 P.3d 956 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 57633.

07-13-2011

Itamar Azael ROMERO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Itamar Azael Romero Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney


Itamar Azael Romero

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from an order of the district court denying a motion for sentence modification. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Brent T. Adams, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).

In his motion filed on April 26, 2010, appellant claimed that the presentence report contained incorrect information about a prior juvenile conviction and that this information was incorrectly relied upon by the sentencing court and the Parole Board. Appellant failed to demonstrate that the district court relied on mistaken assumptions regarding his criminal record that worked to his extreme detriment. See Edwards v. State. 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellant's motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Romero v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 13, 2011
373 P.3d 956 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Romero v. State

Case Details

Full title:Itamar Azael ROMERO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jul 13, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 956 (Nev. 2011)