From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. Riverside Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 14, 2024
EDCV 24-0192 JGB (SHK) (C.D. Cal. May. 14, 2024)

Opinion

EDCV 24-0192 JGB (SHK)

05-14-2024

Isaac Anthony Romero v. Riverside County Sheriff s Department, et al.


Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution (IN CHAMBERS)

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 4(m). Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed R. Civ. Proc. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that Plaintiff has failed to timely serve Defendant by the April 28, 2024 deadline. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before May 24, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed as to the applicable defendants for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by the plaintiff is due.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Romero v. Riverside Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 14, 2024
EDCV 24-0192 JGB (SHK) (C.D. Cal. May. 14, 2024)
Case details for

Romero v. Riverside Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

Case Details

Full title:Isaac Anthony Romero v. Riverside County Sheriff s Department, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 14, 2024

Citations

EDCV 24-0192 JGB (SHK) (C.D. Cal. May. 14, 2024)