From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. Monterey Fin. Servs.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 16, 2022
2:21-cv-02236-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02236-TLN-DB

06-16-2022

MARIE PAMELA ROMERO and MARLITO ROMERO, Plaintiffs, v. MONTEREY FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge

Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On February 14, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-eight days after service of the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 7.) The time for filing objections has expired, and no party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Curt has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 14, 2022 (ECF No. 7) are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiffs' October 28, 2021 Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

3. This action is closed.


Summaries of

Romero v. Monterey Fin. Servs.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 16, 2022
2:21-cv-02236-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Romero v. Monterey Fin. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:MARIE PAMELA ROMERO and MARLITO ROMERO, Plaintiffs, v. MONTEREY FINANCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 16, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-02236-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2022)