From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 19, 2014
ED CV 14-00469-DDP (SH) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2014)

Opinion

ED CV 14-00469-DDP (SH)

12-19-2014

KIRK ROMERO, Petitioner, v. K. HOLLAND, Warden, et al.., Respondents.


ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Final Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and the action is dismissed with prejudice. DATED: December 19, 2014

/s/_________

DEAN D. PREGERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Romero v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 19, 2014
ED CV 14-00469-DDP (SH) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2014)
Case details for

Romero v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:KIRK ROMERO, Petitioner, v. K. HOLLAND WARDEN, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 19, 2014

Citations

ED CV 14-00469-DDP (SH) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2014)