From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. Frederick

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Sep 28, 2005
Case No. 05-3014 MJJ (N.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 05-3014 MJJ.

September 28, 2005

DENNIS CUNNINGHAM, W. GORDON KAUPP, San Francisco, California,

RICHARD L. COSHNEAR Santa Rosa, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff Jose Angel Martinez Romero


E-FILING CASE NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL (C.H.P.) AND DOE SUPERVISORS (F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41)


TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND DEFENDANTS:

Please take NOTICE that Plaintiff, through his undersigned counsel, hereby dismisses, without prejudice, all claims for liability, damages, costs, and fees against defendants California Highway Patrol (C.H.P.) and the C.H.P. Doe Supervisors as contained in ¶¶ 7 and 19 of the Complaint, pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Romero v. Frederick

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Sep 28, 2005
Case No. 05-3014 MJJ (N.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2005)
Case details for

Romero v. Frederick

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ANGEL MARTINEZ ROMERO, Plaintiff, v. California Highway Patrol…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Sep 28, 2005

Citations

Case No. 05-3014 MJJ (N.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2005)