From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. Flowers Bakeries, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 25, 2015
5:14-cv-05189 (N.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2015)

Opinion

          Jennifer S. Romano, CROWELL & MORING LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Joel D. Smith, Rebecca M. Suarez, CROWELL & MORING LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for FLOWERS BAKERIES, LLC

          COUNSELONE, P.C. Anthony Orshansky, Attorneys for Plaintiff Kelly Romero.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING JULY 9, 2015 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND JULY 16, 2015 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

          BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge.

         Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Kelly Romero and Defendant Flowers Bakeries, LLC ("Flowers"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on May 6, 2015, the Court granted in part and denied in part Flowers' motion to dismiss the original complaint in this action. (Doc. No. 35.)

         WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties and this Court's June 3, 2015 Order approving the stipulation, the deadline to file Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("FAC") is July 6, 2015. (Doc. No. 38.)

         WHEREAS, the parties' joint Case Management Statement is due July 9, 2015 and the Initial Case Management Conference is scheduled for July 16, 2015. (Doc. No. 36.)

         WHEREAS, Flowers anticipates that it will likely respond to the FAC by filing another motion to dismiss or stay the action (subject to an analysis of the allegations in the FAC after it is filed). In addition, counsel for Flowers has a scheduling conflict with the currently scheduled July 16, 2015 Case Management Conference.

         THEREFORE, Flowers and Ms. Romero stipulate and respectfully request that the Court continue the Case Management Statement to Thursday, August 20, 2015, and the Case Management Conference to Thursday, August 27, 2015, or as soon thereafter as the Court may designate.

         [PROPOSED ORDER]

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Romero v. Flowers Bakeries, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 25, 2015
5:14-cv-05189 (N.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2015)
Case details for

Romero v. Flowers Bakeries, LLC

Case Details

Full title:KELLY ROMERO, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Jun 25, 2015

Citations

5:14-cv-05189 (N.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2015)