From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. City of Youngsville

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
May 16, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2928 (W.D. La. May. 16, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2928

05-16-2016

TAMMY L. ROMERO v. CITY OF YOUNGSVILLE, ET AL.


MAG. JUDGE CAROL B. WHITEHURST

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in this Court's Ruling and for the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to the extent adopted, and after an independent review of the entire record and the written objections and responses filed herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 47] is DENIED.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 29] is GRANTED IN PART and DEFERRED IN PART. To the extent that Defendants move for summary judgment on Plaintiff's federal claims, the motion is GRANTED, and the federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. To the extent that Defendants move for summary judgment on Plaintiff's state law claims, the Court DEFERS either ruling on the Motion for Summary Judgment as to those claims or declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over those claims until the pending motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 79] is fully resolved.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 16th day of May, 2016.

/s/ _________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Romero v. City of Youngsville

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
May 16, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2928 (W.D. La. May. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Romero v. City of Youngsville

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY L. ROMERO v. CITY OF YOUNGSVILLE, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Date published: May 16, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2928 (W.D. La. May. 16, 2016)