From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. Bobbola

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 27, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-2842 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2842 CKD P

11-27-2012

FREDDIE ROMERO, Plaintiff, v. DR. BOBBOLA, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity either to submit the request to proceed in forma pauperis or to submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.

___________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Romero v. Bobbola

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 27, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-2842 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Romero v. Bobbola

Case Details

Full title:FREDDIE ROMERO, Plaintiff, v. DR. BOBBOLA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 27, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2842 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2012)