From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romeo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 17, 2001
797 So. 2d 25 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 3D01-2139.

August 29, 2001. Opinion on Grant of Certification October 17, 2001.

An appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, David C. Miller, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 95-30842.

Joseph Romeo, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE and GERSTEN, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.


Affirmed. Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

On Motion for Certification


We grant the motion for certification. Defendant-appellant Romeo entered a plea in 1995. He filed a motion for postconviction relief which is timely under Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla. 1999). In it he alleges that he should be granted postconviction relief because his counsel never advised him that his plea could constitute a prior offense in a subsequent proceeding, and that if he had been so advised, he would have gone to trial.

The trial court denied postconviction relief and we affirmed on authority of Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). Defendant filed a timely motion for certification, which we grant.

As we did in Major, we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

Certification granted.


Summaries of

Romeo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 17, 2001
797 So. 2d 25 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Romeo v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joseph ROMEO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 17, 2001

Citations

797 So. 2d 25 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)