From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 16, 1886
101 N.Y. 684 (N.Y. 1886)

Opinion

Submitted March 2, 1886

Decided March 16, 1886

Wm. B. Hornblower for appellant.

Edmund L. Pitts and John Cuneen for respondents.


Agree to affirm without passing upon the validity of the original affidavits attached to the assessment-rolls.

All concur.

Orders affirmed.


Summaries of

Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 16, 1886
101 N.Y. 684 (N.Y. 1886)
Case details for

Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Co. v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:ROME, WATERTOWN AND OGDENSBURG RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v . JAMES E…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 16, 1886

Citations

101 N.Y. 684 (N.Y. 1886)