From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rome v. Sharrow

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Mar 20, 2024
No. A-3135-21 (App. Div. Mar. 20, 2024)

Opinion

A-3135-21

03-20-2024

DENESE ROME, Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. DAVID SHARROW, SR., Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent.

Hegge & Confusione, LLC, attorneys for appellant/cross-respondent (Michael James Confusione, of counsel and on the briefs). Einhorn, Barbarito, Frost & Botwinick, PC, attorneys for respondent/cross-appellant (Bonnie C. Frost, on the brief).


This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

Submitted March 13, 2024

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Gloucester County, Docket No. FM-08-0796-18.

Hegge & Confusione, LLC, attorneys for appellant/cross-respondent (Michael James Confusione, of counsel and on the briefs).

Einhorn, Barbarito, Frost & Botwinick, PC, attorneys for respondent/cross-appellant (Bonnie C. Frost, on the brief).

Before Judges Currier, Firko, and Susswein.

PER CURIAM

This matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties having stipulated to the dismissal of the appeal and cross-appeal, the appeals are dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Rome v. Sharrow

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Mar 20, 2024
No. A-3135-21 (App. Div. Mar. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Rome v. Sharrow

Case Details

Full title:DENESE ROME, Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. DAVID SHARROW, SR.…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Mar 20, 2024

Citations

No. A-3135-21 (App. Div. Mar. 20, 2024)