From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romano v. Ulrich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 30, 2021
13-CV-633 (JLS) (MJR) (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2021)

Opinion

13-CV-633 (JLS) (MJR)

04-30-2021

ANTHONY ROMANO, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN ULRICH, et al., Defendants.


DECISION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Anthony Romano commenced this action on June 17, 2013. Dkt. 1. On November 18, 2016, Defendants moved for summary judgment. Dkt. 56. Judge Wolford issued a Decision and Order granting the motion on August 28, 2017. Dkt. 71. The Second Circuit vacated that judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings on August 22, 2019. Dkt. 76.

The Honorable Elizabeth A. Wolford was previously assigned to this case. On January 3, 2020, this case was reassigned to the undersigned. Dkt. 82. On January 16, 2020, this case was referred to Magistrate Judge Roemer under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). Dkt. 104.

On March 29, 2021, Judge Roemer issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), recommending that this Court grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Dkt. 106. Plaintiff filed objections to the R&R on April 5, 2021. Dkt. 107. Defendants did not respond, and the time to do so has now passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).

A district court may accept, reject, or modify the findings or recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). A district court must conduct a de novo review of those portions of a magistrate judge's recommendation to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

This Court has carefully reviewed the thorough R&R, the record in this case, the objection, and the relevant materials submitted by the parties. Based on that de novo review, the Court accepts and adopts Judge Roemer's recommendation to grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment. The law of the case doctrine does not compel a contrary result. See, e.g., Ezra v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 784 F. App'x 48, 49-50 (2d Cir. 2019) (summary order).

CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated above and in the Report and Recommendation, Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 56) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 30, 2021

Buffalo, New York

/s/_________

JOHN L. SINATRA, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Romano v. Ulrich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 30, 2021
13-CV-633 (JLS) (MJR) (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Romano v. Ulrich

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY ROMANO, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN ULRICH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 30, 2021

Citations

13-CV-633 (JLS) (MJR) (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2021)

Citing Cases

Romano v. Kevin Ulrich, C.O.

The district court relied on its prior analysis in again granting summary judgment to defendants, holding…