From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romano v. Mich. Millers Mut. Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 17, 1989
550 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-3150.

October 11, 1989. Rehearing Denied November 17, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Martin County; Marc A. Cianca, Judge.

Betsy E. Gallagher of Kubicki, Bradley, Draper, Gallagher McGrane, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Paul B. Butler, Jr. and Robert Krug of Butler and Burnette, Tampa, for appellee.


AFFIRMED. In this dispute over coverage under a homeowner's insurance policy, the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the appellee-insurer and against the appellant-insured on three (3) different grounds. We affirm because we find no error in the trial court's conclusion that the incident in question was excluded under a business pursuits exclusion in the policy. We believe the trial court was correct in concluding that there was no dispute that the incident in question arose out of a business pursuit of the insured. Cf. State Farm Casualty Co. v. Friend, 478 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), rev. denied, 488 So.2d 831 (Fla. 1986).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Romano v. Mich. Millers Mut. Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 17, 1989
550 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Romano v. Mich. Millers Mut. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD R. ROMANO, APPELLANT, v. MICHIGAN MILLERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 17, 1989

Citations

550 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)