From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romano v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jan 26, 2024
2:20-cv-573-NPM (M.D. Fla. Jan. 26, 2024)

Opinion

2:20-cv-573-NPM

01-26-2024

BENARDINO ROMANO, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER

NICHOLAS P. MIZELL United States Magistrate Judge.

Having obtained an award of benefits, Benardino Romano requests a fee award pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Doc. 33). Section 406(b) allows an award of a reasonable fee-not to exceed twenty-five percent of the claimant's past-due benefits-for work performed before the court. And for the reasons stated in Romano's motion, the requested fee award is reasonable.

Accordingly, the unopposed fee motion (Doc. 33) is GRANTED, and the clerk is directed to amend the judgment in favor of Romano to include a fee award of $44,041.25.

Because Romano's counsel previously retained the $7,973.50 in fees awarded to Romano under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), they must refund the EAJA fees to Romano.

ORDERED.


Summaries of

Romano v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jan 26, 2024
2:20-cv-573-NPM (M.D. Fla. Jan. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Romano v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:BENARDINO ROMANO, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jan 26, 2024

Citations

2:20-cv-573-NPM (M.D. Fla. Jan. 26, 2024)