From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roman v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 11, 2005
No. CIV S-05-0572 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0572 FCD GGH P.

October 11, 2005


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed July 15, 2005, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Roman v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 11, 2005
No. CIV S-05-0572 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2005)
Case details for

Roman v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:NICO MEDEZ ROMAN, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 11, 2005

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0572 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2005)