From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roman v. Intuary, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 7, 2011
CASE NO. 3:11 CV 03739 - JCS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:11 CV 03739 - JCS

10-07-2011

AMY ROMAN, Plaintiff, v. INTUARY, INC. and AJAY GODHWANI, Defendant.

SUSHILA CHANANA (SBN 254100) DLA PIPER LLP (US) MONICA L. THOMPSON (pro hac vice) ERIN E. WRIGHT (pro hac vice) DLA PIPER LLP (US) Attorneys for Defendants INTUARY, INC. and AJAY GODHWANI ROGER BRIAN IRION (SBN 119865) LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN IRION BRUCE HOWARD LITTLE (pro hac vice) CARRIE RYAN GALLIA (pro hac vice) CHRISTOPHER R. SULLIVAN (pro hac vice) LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P. Attorney for Plaintiff AMY ROMAN


SUSHILA CHANANA (SBN 254100)

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

MONICA L. THOMPSON (pro hac vice)

ERIN E. WRIGHT (pro hac vice)

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

Attorneys for Defendants

INTUARY, INC. and AJAY GODHWANI

ROGER BRIAN IRION (SBN 119865)

LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN IRION

BRUCE HOWARD LITTLE (pro hac vice)

CARRIE RYAN GALLIA (pro hac vice)

CHRISTOPHER R. SULLIVAN (pro hac vice)

LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P.

Attorney for Plaintiff AMY ROMAN

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER

OR OTHERWISE PLEAD


Judge: Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 of the Northern District of California, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by Plaintiff Amy Roman and Defendants Intuary, Inc. and Ajay Godhwani ("Defendants"), by and through their attorneys of record, as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint on July 29, 2011;

WHEREAS, Defendants were properly served on September 21, 2011;

WHEREAS, Defendants retained counsel thereafter;

WHEREAS, Defendants' current deadline to answer or otherwise plead is October 11, 2011;

WHEREAS, the last day to meet and confer is October 14, 2011, pursuant to this Court's Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, which was entered on July 29, 2011;

WHEREAS, the parties agree to extend by twenty-one (21) days the date for Defendants to move to dismiss, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that Defendants may answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by November 1, 2011.

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

SUSHILA CHANANA

Attorneys for Defendants

Intuary, Inc. and Ajay Godhwani

LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN IRION

ROGER BRIAN IRION

Attorneys for Plaintiff Amy Roman

ATTESTATION

I, Sushila Chanana, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Roger Brian Irion has concurred in this filing.

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

SUSHILA CHANANA

Attorneys for Defendants

Intuary, Inc. and Ajay Godhwani


Summaries of

Roman v. Intuary, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 7, 2011
CASE NO. 3:11 CV 03739 - JCS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Roman v. Intuary, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AMY ROMAN, Plaintiff, v. INTUARY, INC. and AJAY GODHWANI, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 3:11 CV 03739 - JCS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)