From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roman v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 28, 2007
41 A.D.3d 1102 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 500843.

June 28, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Benjamin Roman, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Mugglin and Kane, JJ.


Petitioner was found guilty, following a tier III disciplinary hearing, of engaging in violent conduct, assaulting an inmate and possessing a weapon. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. During the pendency of this proceeding, the determination was administratively reversed and all references thereto were expunged from petitioner's institutional record. In view of this, and since petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Kalwasinski v Goord, 29 AD3d 1104, 1105).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Roman v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 28, 2007
41 A.D.3d 1102 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Roman v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BENJAMIN ROMAN, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 28, 2007

Citations

41 A.D.3d 1102 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 5601
837 N.Y.S.2d 597

Citing Cases

Toney v. Goord

The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…

Parkinson v. McGinnis

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination in question has been administratively…